Share the story of what Open Access means to you
![a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access](/assets/oa-lock-logo-lg-a95dd8d9f9fe5e21ab4499ffd0c8661e55f7d788ae0a03f19a6749eb82e3e899.png)
University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.
Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings in the U.S. Senate: Reconsidering the Charade
Dion Farganis and Justin WedekingCritics claim that Supreme Court nominees have become more evasive in recent decades and that Senate confirmation hearings lack real substance. Conducting a line-by-line analysis of the confirmation hearing of every nominee since 1955—an original dataset of nearly 11,000 questions and answers from testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee—Dion Farganis and Justin Wedeking discover that nominees are far more forthcoming than generally assumed. Applying an original scoring system to assess each nominee's testimony based on the same criteria, they show that some of the earliest nominees were actually less willing to answer questions than their contemporary counterparts. Factors such as changes in the political culture of Congress and the 1981 introduction of televised coverage of the hearings have created the impression that nominee candor is in decline. Further, senators' votes are driven more by party and ideology than by a nominee's responsiveness to their questions. Moreover, changes in the confirmation process intersect with increasing levels of party polarization as well as constituents' more informed awareness and opinions of recent Supreme Court nominees.
-
Cover
-
Title
-
Copyright
-
Dedication
-
Contents
-
Acknowledgments
-
Chapter 1 A Vapid and Hollow Charade?
-
Chapter 2 The Hearings in Historical Perspective
-
Chapter 3 Coding the Hearings
-
Chapter 4 Are Supreme Court Nominees Forthcoming?
-
Chapter 5 Polarized and Televised: Changes in Committee Voting since 1981
-
Chapter 6 The Perception Gap
-
Chapter 7 Can the Hearings Be Improved? Do They Need to Be?
-
Notes
-
References
-
Index
![](/image-service/4q77fs37x1542602688/full/full/0/default.png)
Citable Link
Published: 2014
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
- 978-0-472-11933-2 (hardcover)
- 978-0-472-12027-7 (ebook)