University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.
Committees and the Decline of Lawmaking in Congress
Jonathan Lewallen
You don't have access to this book. Please try to log in with your institution.Log in
The public, journalists, and legislators themselves have often lamented a decline in congressional lawmaking in recent years, often blaming party politics for the lack of legislative output. In Committees and the Decline of Lawmaking in Congress, Jonathan Lewallen examines the decline in lawmaking from a new, committee-centered perspective. Lewallen tests his theory against other explanations such as partisanship and an increased demand for oversight with multiple empirical tests and traces shifts in policy activity by policy area using the Policy Agendas Project coding scheme.
He finds that because party leaders have more control over the legislative agenda, committees have spent more of their time conducting oversight instead. Partisanship alone does not explain this trend; changes in institutional rules and practices that empowered party leaders have created more uncertainty for committees and contributed to a shift in their policy activities. The shift toward oversight at the committee level combined with party leader control over the voting agenda means that many members of Congress are effectively cut out of many of the institution's policy decisions. At a time when many, including Congress itself, are considering changes to modernize the institution and keep up with a stronger executive branch, the findings here suggest that strengthening Congress will require more than running different candidates or providing additional resources.
Cover
Title Page
Copyright Page
Contents
Preface and Acknowledgments
One. Committees and Congress in the Policy Process
Two. Myths and Realities of Congressional Lawmaking
Fig. 4.3. Trends in Gridlock Intervals, 1981–2014. (Source: Voteview.com, calculated by the author. Common Space scores were only available through 2014 when the data were collected.)
Fig. 4.4. Voting Extremity of the Supermajoritarian Pivots, 1981–2014. (Source: Voteview.com, calculated by the author. Common Space scores were only available through 2014 when the data were collected.)
x
This site requires cookies to function correctly.